rubenf
rubenf•2y ago

Thanks. @Felix did that with selenium: https://docs.windmill.dev/blog/use-selenium-with-windmill

Thanks. @Felix did that with selenium: https://docs.windmill.dev/blog/use-selenium-with-windmill
How to Use Selenium and Selenoid with Windmill | Windmill
We will look at how to use Windmill and Selenoid, and Selenium Wire for the
17 Replies
Unknown User
Unknown User•2y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
antonioalves
antonioalves•2y ago
Thanks! I'll try it
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
@.oddlyordinary added JOB_RETENTION_SECS
Unknown User
Unknown User•2y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
Yes we have the disabled config that is an eval for this purpose
Said Hasyim
Said Hasyim•2y ago
hey Ruben, sorry, in self-hosted mode, I hit the red color when I refreshed the Google Oauth token "Bad request: Error refreshing token: request resulted in error response: 400 Bad Request: invalid_grant: Token has been expired or revoked." This expires every 7 days. Would you know whether this is expected in self-hosted mode? or perhaps i missed out something during my configuration that i shall check further.
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
This is on google side, they do not allow refresh token to be valid for more than 7 days in test mode
Said Hasyim
Said Hasyim•2y ago
Okay. thanks a lot Ruben 🙂
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
probably the best is to use an api key
Said Hasyim
Said Hasyim•2y ago
Okay, I will explore that setup. Thanks for letting me know
Unknown User
Unknown User•2y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
That's an interesting feature. We do not have a built-in way to do this, but you could store the result using setResource, and then comment the code, and getResource instead It's not super convenient, I will add that feature to the backlog
Unknown User
Unknown User•2y ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Sindre
Sindre•2y ago
@Jim would you say your request is the same as I mentioned here: https://discord.com/channels/930051556043276338/930051949888405524/1098947728844795915 Or did I misunderstand you?
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
I think it's different but your proposal would achieve most of the same benefits @Sindre (also I will do it asap, it's not far in my backlog)
Sindre
Sindre•2y ago
Yeah I think it's the same problem. Just we express it in different way. As long as we both are able to use a result from a previous step multiple time while testing we will both be happy. If I understand Jim correct
rubenf
rubenf•2y ago
I will do it tonight more or less