SYou want to provide only 1 of 4 params?
Or is some of the fields conditional based on the others?
Or is some of the fields conditional based on the others?
Aif you can use an object for all params, typescript can handle these requirements.
made an example here: https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/C4TwDgpgBAQghgZwgBTgJzgWwVAvFAbwCgoo4BjciBBAfWAHsBrCAOwC4oFg0BLVgOZEAvkSKhIUAMrA4wAK4JUGbHliIU6LDgBkhEl1kKEnAEQBBcsF4A3CKagAfKKYCSrCtbsPnpmA2AAC1MRMQloAGEGABNNFRx8eCRlbSg9YlJyGIhObj5BUPFwaGRAhlY41MSNFNV0gzAyityefiFRIslahOkjRW6nKCjYgedS8srsMQgADzAGNGAyBBBWcigAM3k163KoTDh+AAowLWxOboBKQmEgA
made an example here: https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/C4TwDgpgBAQghgZwgBTgJzgWwVAvFAbwCgoo4BjciBBAfWAHsBrCAOwC4oFg0BLVgOZEAvkSKhIUAMrA4wAK4JUGbHliIU6LDgBkhEl1kKEnAEQBBcsF4A3CKagAfKKYCSrCtbsPnpmA2AAC1MRMQloAGEGABNNFRx8eCRlbSg9YlJyGIhObj5BUPFwaGRAhlY41MSNFNV0gzAyityefiFRIslahOkjRW6nKCjYgedS8srsMQgADzAGNGAyBBBWcigAM3k163KoTDh+AAowLWxOboBKQmEgA
The Playground lets you write TypeScript or JavaScript online in a safe and sharable way.
Amade a refined example that shows you how to utilize an additional field with a constant value to get truly magnificent type checking:
https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/C4TwDgpgBAQghgZwgBTgJzgWwVAvFAbwCgoo4BjciBBAfWAHsBrCAOwC4oFg0BLVgOZEAvkSKhIUAMrA4wAK4JUGbHliIU6LDgBkhElAkROAIm5zFJgDQHzChKYCC5YLwBuEE1AA+UEwElWClcPL18TGAZgAAsTETEjKABhBgATTRUcfHgkZW0oPWJSI1NyNM8bUjL0zm4+QXjxcGhkaIZWDPzsjTzVQoMSvzA2jusDYfbjLh5+IVEmyV6s6Vl7JZ9k8vXfVsmlsQgADzAGNGAyBBBWcigAM3lr13aoTDh+AAowLWxOJYBKfSkXi3KCfb4IAB0iVw+DMq0sAKKpCgZVYCAYABsIBCMQwBGDMhC7Io-gZSAB6clQEAMeQouCsADk50U0C+hOq0FOUHZ2ghEw6UGiEDQEDJUEpyJMYDQDEgZxAUEZnMZUFSDGoUFYUSgR143Cgz0SjJkFiU4MZcWRKPa6KxOLxBL5nNJpGEuoxSCgwNBvOwUOaeFhnJMiPFqLt2Nx+L9kJdBndEE90B9Tv90NhAs8YetEcxUcdsf5Iwgrqg82EQA
https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/C4TwDgpgBAQghgZwgBTgJzgWwVAvFAbwCgoo4BjciBBAfWAHsBrCAOwC4oFg0BLVgOZEAvkSKhIUAMrA4wAK4JUGbHliIU6LDgBkhElAkROAIm5zFJgDQHzChKYCC5YLwBuEE1AA+UEwElWClcPL18TGAZgAAsTETEjKABhBgATTRUcfHgkZW0oPWJSI1NyNM8bUjL0zm4+QXjxcGhkaIZWDPzsjTzVQoMSvzA2jusDYfbjLh5+IVEmyV6s6Vl7JZ9k8vXfVsmlsQgADzAGNGAyBBBWcigAM3lr13aoTDh+AAowLWxOJYBKfSkXi3KCfb4IAB0iVw+DMq0sAKKpCgZVYCAYABsIBCMQwBGDMhC7Io-gZSAB6clQEAMeQouCsADk50U0C+hOq0FOUHZ2ghEw6UGiEDQEDJUEpyJMYDQDEgZxAUEZnMZUFSDGoUFYUSgR143Cgz0SjJkFiU4MZcWRKPa6KxOLxBL5nNJpGEuoxSCgwNBvOwUOaeFhnJMiPFqLt2Nx+L9kJdBndEE90B9Tv90NhAs8YetEcxUcdsf5Iwgrqg82EQA
The Playground lets you write TypeScript or JavaScript online in a safe and sharable way.
S@Craig could you post more of the code then that. The snippet is too small to be able to help you
SAhh sorry. Then i misunderstood you. On the phone, but that seems right.
SAhh. No you need " " around the keys I think to be 100% valid JSON
SI think i asked the windmill overlord if it was possible to fix. Its a small thing but its def a easy mistake to do. a .1 % DX improvemnt could be done.
Let's notified over supreme overload about it so he can +1 the issue - @rubenf FYI.
Let's notified over supreme overload about it so he can +1 the issue - @rubenf FYI.
Rsomeone called?
Rsorry I'm not sure to see exactly the code that triggers the error
Rto format well multiline, you have to use triple quotes
RI'm still confused
SJust that JSON has " around keys. So many places in general in the world they have a lax parsing and not that strict parsing of it.
RAaah, yes those only accept valid json
RI understand this is frustrating if you're used to javascript
RRather than relaxing what we accept, we can probably offer to autofix it
RI actually thought monaco would autofix in some cases
Ranyway, genie out
SNo not really. At runtime this is just JS not TS. So the json is just json.