any updates on being able to remote a custom workspace error handler if you are not in EE but still
any updates on being able to remote a custom workspace error handler if you are not in EE but still have a script selected
Rstandard clause of our contracts is that you will get a perpetual license in the event of cease of operation. But also, we would just OSS everything.
Rupdate workspace_settings set error_handler = null
Zsorry, where should I be running that
Ryour windmill db, psql client or as a postgres script that point to your database url
Zgotcha, thanks
R@mattkushner just a note that because of a recursive loop on your imports, it caused stackoverflow on our workers, it's fixed now
Rdeploying soon
AI wonder if I've misunderstood the permission system completely, I have a script that is being executed by
service_user. The service_user only has access to two folders. The script being executed imports from resources and works fine when I run it as myself. But when service_user runs it the script fails with a Python import error where the script is apparently unable to import the module from the resources folder. I thought this would work. Do I need to grant service_user recursive accesss to all the dependencies of the script too?Ryes
Rthat''s why it makes more sense to group things into folders and assign permissions at the folder level
Rwould also recommend just using webhook-specific token tied to your users
ASo after some discussion internally we decided to go with service users so we didn't need one token per script that was going to be called. But instead of adding the service user to a group and then granting permissions for the group I just granted permission to the user directly.
And TBH, it's kinda baffling that the permissions work differently when granted on a folder level vs the user level? Maybe I'm missing something, but to me a group just seems like a convenient way to grant the same permissions to a bunch of users?
And TBH, it's kinda baffling that the permissions work differently when granted on a folder level vs the user level? Maybe I'm missing something, but to me a group just seems like a convenient way to grant the same permissions to a bunch of users?
Rthey don't work differently
Rpermissions granted at the folder level are inherited by everything inside it, in a cumulative way with item specific permissions
Rbut maybe you mistyped group instead of folders ?
RBut if that's the case, they also don't work differently
AYeah sorry I meant group. If group and direct assignment should work the same way I must have made some mistake in my assignments, I'll go double-check that then before pointing more fingers
AYeah, can confirm, I hadn't granted permission for the user to the dependent folder. I think the confusion stems from the fact that I've created an app which uses all of these supporting dependencies and that works even if the users that have access to the app only have access to the app.
ASo the problem here is that the script was
tools/my_script and it depended on resources/mongodb_wrapper (which is not just a connection but a wrapper lib). So I assumed that granting the user access to tools/my_script would be sufficient as that appears to be how Apps work. And I think I would really like if scripts worked that way too as it's really hard to have to remember to grant access to all the recursive dependencies of the script.
DI'm trying to use the docker compose example, and running into this error when running up, seems like the docker images are private?
Error response from daemon: Head "https://ghcr.io/v2/windmill-labs/windmill/manifests/main": denied: denied
Error response from daemon: Head "https://ghcr.io/v2/windmill-labs/windmill/manifests/main": denied: denied
DHuh looks like I needed to login to ghcr.io on docker, hadn't needed to do that before, images are pulling now.
Looking forward to trying this out
Looking forward to trying this out
AI never have to
docker loginIs there a menu type system like a bootstrap nav bar? Main idea there would be to provide an app that acted like a CRM, with multiple pages to go to without having to go back to the directory
DThe menu items would be other apps most likely
SThe Dropdown Menu component is meant to embed one of several Button components and display them in a dropdown menu.
Ryes it's expected
Ryes
R@emk428 you probably want to configure it as an extra bunfig config registry in the instance settings UI, and you can test locally that it works since the format is the same: https://bun.sh/docs/install/registries
Bun
How to configure private scopes and custom package registries.
R
Rno your import looks correct. I would suggest asking for help on the bun discord since you seem to have the same problem locally and Windmill doesn't do anything different than what bun support
MHi, im trying to create a postgres resource managed by aws, with ssl disabled. I already created a user and whitelisted the workers IPs but when i test the connection a get "FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry for host". I tested the same setup using dbeaver and didn't have any problem. How can i fix this? thanks in advance
R
Rnote to ourself, it's clearly not easy to find enough
R(Try it for a month at bottom)