Kaspar
Kaspar
PostsComments
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
I see... 😬
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Am I silly to think that it should be: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 18:00:00 EEST Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 18:45:00 EEST Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 19:30:00 EEST Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 20:15:00 EEST Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 21:00:00 EEST
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
No description
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Gotcha, thanks Idempotency is not an issue in my case, i.e. it's naturally idempotent
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Okay, thanks
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
There is a "chromium" worker group for some reason, can I hackishly use that?
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Oh
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
No description
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Ahh, I can't create a dedicated worker myself on the Cloud version
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Gotcha! As a follow-up, to optimize on the performance/cost, do you recommend using dedicated worker feature for that one part of the flow, or would enabling the "shared directory" have the same effect essentially (because of the re-use of the worker)? It's a single flow that run every half hour with a lot of iterations.
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by Kaspar on 10/21/2024 in #help
In a flow, is it possible to invoke for-loop parallelism on a single worker, to save on cost
Shameless @rubenf ping! 😅
27 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
tiny ping
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
At a glance*
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
No description
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
No description
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
Cool, but do you agree it's hard for me to tell that?
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
Kind of related to this: https://discord.com/channels/930051556043276338/1169575765063520326/1257060572705456200
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
No description
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
gm @rubenf I ran the test again and it worked as expected. Thanks for the swift update, again!
25 replies
WWindmill
Created by rubenf on 7/5/2024 in #general
No concurrency limits is the right way
Let me know when I can run the test again on app.windmill.dev
25 replies