okay that fixed the issue, I'm wondering how my windmill db got in that state though since I never r

okay that fixed the issue, I'm wondering how my windmill db got in that state though since I never run any manual migrations. Did I miss an upgrade message about needing to run a manual migration?

Diego•10/16/25, 6:45 PM

no this should have been run automatically liked other migrations

Diego•10/16/25, 6:45 PM

i don't understand either

Diego•10/16/25, 6:45 PM

@rubenf if you have an idea how it's possible that a migration got skipped

rubenf•10/16/25, 6:45 PM

Not possible

Diego•10/16/25, 6:46 PM

well it's magic

Diego•10/16/25, 6:46 PM

never happened before

Rrubenf look for the associated dependency job

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:18 PM

sorry im not seeing any issues with depedency jobs eitehr

Rrubberducky sorry im not seeing any issues with depedency jobs eitehr

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:36 PM

Is it just having infinite spinner e.g. deployment in progress? Are lockfiles generated?

If there is no locks there is likely a djob somewhere still running.

Did you try to redeploy?

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:36 PM

I actually wiped my entire windmill instance and did a fresh push

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:37 PM

" Deployment in progress" on the flow page

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:38 PM

What version are you on? The minimal reproduction is to just create a flow and deploy it?

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:38 PM

1.555.1

PPyra What version are you on? The minimal reproduction is to just create a flow and d...

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:39 PM

Any specific actions? Imports?

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:41 PM

And what is your infra? k8s? Docker? Native?

Ttl_jacob okay that fixed the issue, I'm wondering how my windmill db got in that state th...

Diego•10/16/25, 7:42 PM

Did you ever do something to your global settings that might have deleted it ?

Diego•10/16/25, 7:42 PM

I'm going through the code and assuming the migration ran, I don't see how this was possible

PPyra And what is your infra? k8s? Docker? Native?

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:42 PM

right now a local docker running

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:43 PM

its a rather complicated flow, all python is checked and valid with tests and i can confirm they work.

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:43 PM

I can view all scripts etc on the frontend

DDiego Did you ever do something to your global settings that might have deleted it ?

tl_jacobOP•10/16/25, 7:44 PM

I've been setting instance-level settings using a instance_settings.yamlinstance_settings.yaml that doesn't have any ducklake settings

Diego•10/16/25, 7:44 PM

Diego•10/16/25, 7:45 PM

there we go

thanks

tl_jacobOP•10/16/25, 7:47 PM

@Diego just to be clear I do feel like the way this has broken is not an optimal customer/developer experience. I don't think upgrading versions should break in this way.

Diego•10/16/25, 7:47 PM

yes it's a bug

Rrubberducky its a rather complicated flow, all python is checked and valid with tests and i ...

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:47 PM

Could it just be locking things? Could happen if you have poor connectivity.

But if it is complicated flow, I think it is the best to gradually reduce until it works

tl_jacobOP•10/16/25, 7:48 PM

@Diego gotcha! happy to be a point of contact on the fix if that's helpful

really appreciate how you + ruben have hopped in here so quickly

PPyra Could it just be locking things? Could happen if you have poor connectivity. Bu...

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:51 PM

ill refactor it and start with each step until it breaks somewhere

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:52 PM

Yeah. But you should really check dependency jobs. You can filter by that job kind in run page

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:52 PM

I just think you have something heavy or it is somehow stuck on a a dependency

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:53 PM

its a local instance, no jobs running except the deployment

Pyra•10/16/25, 7:54 PM

by heavy I mean you have hundreds of dependencies (including transitive) and your instance didn't finish fetching all necessarily metadata

rubberducky•10/16/25, 7:58 PM

they all finished, is there a chance one may have not?

Pyra•10/16/25, 8:11 PM

If it is a single flow and there is no relative imports, it would be a single dependency job. If that dependency job has finished then the flow should be viewable as deployed

metapontum•10/17/25, 11:02 AM

This is how simple it could be to interact with wmill storage / ducklake

metapontum•10/17/25, 11:04 AM

https://bun.com/blog/bun-v1.3

Bun

Bun 1.3

Bun 1.3 introduces zero-config frontend development, unified SQL API, built-in Redis client, security enhancements, package catalogs, async stack traces, VS Code test integration, and Node.js compatibility improvements.

metapontum•10/17/25, 11:16 AM

Very impressive from bun, when I was reading it I kept thinking that these can be made to interoperate with windmill by default

metapontum•10/17/25, 11:21 AM

Resources ≈ redis KV (types can be specified inline, defaulting to ‘state’ _resource_type: ‘s3’)
Variables ≈ secrets
Storage ≈ s3
* Ducklake ≈ sql

rubenf•10/17/25, 11:44 AM

Agreed @metapontum , we will probably want a simplified syntax, maybe a one function call in our sdk to setup the s3 client

Zach•10/17/25, 3:01 PM

Have you thought about Bun to build/serve the raw apps, @rubenf? (I’ve actually been using raw apps to iframe to a subdomain with a cookie.) Was reading through some of the raw apps branch and was just curious?

rubenf•10/17/25, 3:07 PM

@Zach raw apps are purely static frontend rendering + windmill jobs for background runnables

rubenf•10/17/25, 3:47 PM

https://youtube.com/live/mrnmNgQ22jE?feature=share weekly!

YouTubeWindmill

Windmill Weekly 17th October, 2025

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Rrubenf https://youtube.com/live/mrnmNgQ22jE?feature=share weekly!

Kelora•10/17/25, 4:36 PM

excited for the ui polish, wanted to suggest some attention on this tiny papercut I run into a lot. Resizing these panes can be hard especially on high resolution/remote desktop.

rubenf•10/17/25, 4:56 PM

at very least we could make it bigger on hover I suppose

Kelora•10/17/25, 4:57 PM

i dont think it needs to be visibly bigger, but a few more pixels of "grip" would help a ton

Kelora•10/17/25, 4:57 PM

the area where my pointer turns into a resizer

Kelora•10/17/25, 4:58 PM

i think this is extra bad with remote desktop that might be why few people notice

IceCactus•10/18/25, 4:37 AM

I have a git repo that i create and work with wmill scripts. I also have the windmill instance setup in a docker compose in said repo. I sync this repo between home and work machines. So home instance of windmill is not the same as the work instance. They should be configured the same and use the same workspace encryption key. I do a git pull, then wmill sync push. However files that were deleted keep showing back up, and im still having the issue where .sh scripts are not adding the input parameters to the yaml file. I have also tried git pull, wmill script generate-metadata, wmilll sync push with same results. Am I not doing something right?

rubenf•10/18/25, 4:48 AM

Every steps you've described should be easy to debug if something is going not as expected @IceCactus as it's very explicit. Also try with a more minimal example and see.

Rrubenf Every steps you've described should be easy to debug if something is going not a...

IceCactus•10/18/25, 5:43 AM

So what im doing should work? I dont want to waste time on doing something it wasn't designed to do.

rubenf•10/18/25, 5:44 AM

the sync will make target == source yes