tersercoder

PostsComments

WWindmill

•Created by tersercoder on 8/14/2023 in #help

Issue with Bearer token

thanks, it worked; seems we did something not very smart. but sometimes you go down the path of debugging and then it was never supported in the first place. Thanks and keep up the good work!

14 replies

WWindmill

•Created by tersercoder on 8/14/2023 in #help

Issue with Bearer token

ok, when i replace the cookie with the bearer token it does work indeed. so now i'm going to compare what's the difference

14 replies

WWindmill

•Created by tersercoder on 8/14/2023 in #help

Issue with Bearer token

i'm sure it's something else, just trying to figure what; i thought maybe it's known, but if not, i'm going to debug further; thanks! When i figure something, i'll report back

14 replies

WWindmill

•Created by tersercoder on 8/14/2023 in #help

Issue with Bearer token

let me try!

14 replies

WWindmill

•Created by tersercoder on 8/14/2023 in #help

Issue with Bearer token

i am trying the exact copy of what i see in the browser network tab, so : - i make a token with Account Settings for my (admin) user - in the web interface, i make a script under the path /u/itsme/test - that works, and i see the call do /scripts/create succeeding - then i remove that script via the web interface - i copy the exact json it used to create that script from chrome - i copy that into my curl with the bearer token from step #1 and get a 401

14 replies

WWindmill

•Created by ESiteHoster on 8/11/2023 in #help

White Labeling

right and that's good; so it should indeed be clear what users can and cannot do as the agpl is one of least well understood ones (the weirdest properties are attributed to it on reddit and such, which makes it highly unpopular for company use) . and open core is crap , so hope it doesn't happen!

17 replies

WWindmill

•Created by ESiteHoster on 8/11/2023 in #help

White Labeling

*interpreted wrong

17 replies

WWindmill

•Created by ESiteHoster on 8/11/2023 in #help

White Labeling

it's just that the agpl is interpreted a lot and abused by both sides (the company + users)

17 replies

WWindmill

•Created by ESiteHoster on 8/11/2023 in #help

White Labeling

you should be 🙂 it has a license and the license should be adhered to; if people don't like it, then build your own or buy yours. simple 🙂

17 replies

WWindmill

•Created by ESiteHoster on 8/11/2023 in #help

White Labeling

yes, correct

17 replies

WWindmill

•Created by ESiteHoster on 8/11/2023 in #help

White Labeling

It depends what is considered whitelabel, but you can offer it as long as you include access to the modified source and retain the copyrights and licenses of the source. Removing all windmill logo's etc is not something that's not allowed, as long as you link to the source code of those changes.

17 replies